

By observing birds during sleep, a particular corporeal strategy becomes evident. The bird withdraws its head beneath a wing, while the plumage expands to generate a microclimate that mitigates exposure to nocturnal cold. This configuration temporarily alters the bird’s visible anatomy: the head disappears into the body, suggesting a suspension of outward perception and a partial retreat from the surrounding world.
This work considers vulnerability not only as exposure, but as an intrinsic consequence of self-protection. While the bird’s posture functions as a defensive mechanism, it simultaneously produces a state of heightened fragility. In withdrawing its sensory organs and consciousness from the environment, the bird becomes less reactive, surrendering control in order to rest. Protection, in this sense, is inseparable from risk: the body survives by entering a condition of dependence on the stability of its environment.
The sleeping bird thus embodies a relational state in which the boundary between organism and environment is continuously negotiated.
Within this relational state, the work situates risk not as an exceptional rupture but as a normalized condition of survival. Contemporary philosophy has articulated endurance as increasingly dependent on strategic withdrawal: moments in which constant responsiveness is suspended in order to persist. Protection here does not abolish danger, but reorganises it. The formation of a temporary interior condition does not negate external instability; it remains contingent upon it, accepting vulnerability as structural rather than accidental.
This logic finds an analogy in human historical conditions in which danger becomes a stable background rather than a discrete event. Prolonged warfare, environmental precarity, and sustained states of crisis have required bodies and communities to adapt not through continuous vigilance, but through the normalization of threat. Life continues by learning how to rest within uncertainty, to accept partial blindness and reduced agency as the cost of endurance. In this sense, the work aligns the wild and the human not through metaphor, but through a shared condition: survival emerges through an inhabitable relation to risk, in which exposure is neither resolved nor escaped, but rendered bearable.